Verification standard

documented review,
not legal guarantee.

Our review is a documented assessment for a defined intended use. It is not a guarantee that a dataset is legally perfect for every possible scenario — and we'd rather be honest about that than dress it up.

three review layers · one verdict · evidence documented in the Verification Report
The three layers

what each layer checks. against what evidence.

The Waiser Dataset Passport summarises the dataset, intended use, verification outcome and material limitations. The Verification Report records the assessment methods, evidence and findings. Same structure every time — the only thing that changes is which section each reader cares about most.

01

Technical review

Whether the dataset is derived from real data, which generation method was used, whether there are limitations in source data, and whether key generation parameters are recorded.

  • Origin — derived from real data, fully synthetic, or hybrid (and how).
  • Generation method — model, technique, version, seed dependencies.
  • Source data limitations — gaps, biases or coverage holes inherited from the seed.
  • Parameter record — which parameters were locked, which were swept, and what was logged.
Evidence · Provider documentation, sample inspection, parameter manifest.

02

Legal and licensing review

Legal status, relevant regimes, rights to the dataset, permitted uses, prohibited uses, buyer responsibility, provider responsibility.

  • Legal status — basis on which the dataset can be offered.
  • Relevant regimes — the legal context the dataset is offered under (jurisdiction specifics live in the licence).
  • Rights — provider's rights to the underlying material.
  • Permitted / prohibited uses — written out in the licence, not implied.
  • Responsibility split — what stays with the buyer and what stays with the provider.
Evidence · Licence text, provider declarations, rights documentation.

03

Ethical review

Sensitivity of scenarios, potential for misuse, risk to specific groups, and clarity of guidance for reviewers.

  • Scenario sensitivity — categories of content that warrant reviewer notes.
  • Misuse potential — uses the dataset enables that the licence must therefore forbid.
  • Group-level risk — disparate impact on specific groups, where applicable.
  • Reviewer guidance — clarity of guidance the Dataset Passport carries forward to downstream reviewers.
Evidence · Sample inspection, reviewer notes attached to the Verification Report.
Honesty clause

what verification is. what it isn't.

Is

  • A documented assessment for a defined intended use.
  • A consistent structure across every listed dataset, so reviewers compare like with like.
  • A written record of what we checked, what we didn't, and what evidence backed each conclusion.

Isn't

  • A guarantee that a dataset is legally flawless for every possible scenario.
  • A substitute for your own legal, security or model-quality review.
  • A static stamp — outcomes are revisited as the dataset evolves, and the version record carries the trail.
Documented at every step

review a real dataset passport and verification report.

The standard is most legible inside an actual listing — open one and follow the references back to this page.